Human Signals
Choice

Why Today's Reward Often Beats Tomorrow's Bigger Reward

The future self is important. The present self has better access to the wallet.

Author

Alok Jha

Reading

2 min read

Category

Choice

Almost everyone understands compound interest. That does not make saving easy. Almost everyone understands sleep. That does not stop midnight scrolling. Knowing the future value of a choice does not eliminate the gravitational pull of now.

Present bias describes our tendency to give disproportionate weight to immediate rewards and costs. ₹1,000 today can feel more attractive than a larger amount later. A dessert now competes very effectively with a vague future benefit called 'better health.'

The future self is psychologically distant. We care about that person, but not always as intensely as the person currently holding the phone, smelling the food or seeing the sale banner.

This explains why commitment devices can work. Automatic investments, scheduled transfers, app blockers and prepaid classes reduce the number of future moments when temptation gets to renegotiate the plan.

Good systems move decisions to moments of clarity. Decide the SIP amount when thinking about long-term wealth, not when the salary has already arrived and ten purchases are competing for it. Decide the walking time at night, not under the blanket at 6:30 a.m.

Businesses also exploit present bias with 'buy now, pay later.' The pleasure is immediate; the cost is separated and softened. This does not make such products inherently bad, but it changes how the cost is experienced.

A useful personal trick is to make future rewards more concrete. 'Retirement' is abstract. 'The ability to choose work without needing the salary at sixty' is more vivid. 'Health' is abstract. 'Being able to travel comfortably with family' has a picture attached.

The present will usually speak louder than the future. Behaviour improves when we stop asking the future to shout and start giving it better microphones.

MONEY

The emotions and biases behind financial behaviour

Selected research anchors & further reading

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. Source

Kamenica, E. (2012). Behavioral Economics and Psychology of Incentives. Annual Review of Economics. Source

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Source

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. Source

Join Human Signals

One thoughtful exploration of human behaviour each week. Free.

Subscribe free →